After a structured AI debate, Consensusia doesn't leave you with a vague paragraph. It delivers a verdict — GO, NO-GO, or Conditional — plus risks, dissent, and an action plan. The format is designed for operators who need to move fast without skipping hard trade-offs.
What each verdict means
- GO: the committee sees enough upside and manageable risk to proceed now, with the stated plan.
- NO-GO: the downside, cash impact, or missing evidence outweighs the case for moving forward today.
- Conditional: proceed only if specific gates are met — a hire, a metric, a pilot, or a deadline.
Why Conditional is often the most valuable outcome
Real strategic decisions rarely reduce to binary yes/no. Conditional verdicts force explicit gates: "GO if runway stays above 8 months after hire," or "NO-GO unless CAC payback drops below 14 months." That language is what you can take to a co-founder, board, or investor — not "the AI said maybe."
How to use the rest of the memo
- Recommendation: the one-sentence executive summary — start here.
- Why / Risks / Dissent: the arguments you need to stress-test before committing.
- Action plan: concrete next steps, often sequenced (validate → pilot → scale).
- Confidence score: a signal of alignment across agents, not a probability of success.
Common mistake
Treating a GO as permission to skip validation. The committee assumes your context is accurate. If your runway or churn numbers are stale, rerun the debate with updated inputs — the verdict is only as good as the context you provide.